A US airstrike against the town of Hit held by the
Islamic State killed 22 civilians and wounded many more as an
apartments and a market were hit according to local residents.
Residents believe
the target was a building not far down the road but it was not hit,
indicating that the strike was an error. The US Central Command
(CENTCOM) according to one source simply said that an attack west of
Ramadi hit an ISIS-held building. A
Kuwait source quotes CENTCOM as reporting several ISIS-held buildings being hit:
An
airstrike in western Ramadi destroyed three ISIL-held buildings and
damaged two more, destroyed two ISIL anti-aircraft artillery pieces, and
destroyed an ISIL unit, the statement said.
Hit is a strategic town in the Euphrates River Valley in Anbar province.
Major Curtis Kellogg a
spokesperson for CENTCOM said there was no evidence that there were any
civilian casualties in the Hit bombings. However this type of blanket
statement is a standard response. The same is true for most cases in
Afghanistan as well where NATO airstrikes have killed civilians. Even
when Afghan officials confirm reports NATO or ISAF officials often
refuse to change their account unless forced to do so by compelling
evidence to the contrary.
The reports of casualties are not from Islamic State media but from
the National Iraqi News Agency. The Agency claimed that US coalition
forces bombs hit a market and that four children were among the dead and
that the planes also bombed an "apartment building inhabited with
families". A "security source" claimed that hundreds of families have
fled Hit as bombings escalate.
A resident of Raqqa, the
main center held by IS in Syria, Abu Ibrahim Raqqawi told BBC: "The
people are against IS, but if the USA bombs Raqqa, we will be with IS
against the USA." He welcomed the bombing of the Tabqa air base and the
group's headquarters in central Raqqa but claimed: .
"Islamic State
want these air strikes, because they know if it's just air strikes
without forces on the ground, they will not fall down, and a lot of
fighters will join them to fight the Americans."
No doubt there will
be similar responses in areas of Iraq controlled by the Islamic State
especially since many of the Sunnis who cooperate with IS are former
supporters of Hussein and will also see the US as simply agent's of the
detested Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad.
No doubt the U.S. wlll try to create another Awakening Movement or
Sons of Iraq
to counter the radical jihadists. The groups were bankrolled by the
U.S. and as soon as the paycheck vanished everything fell apart:
Due
to Shiʻite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's refusal to fully integrate
the Sons of Iraq into the Iraqi Security Services, "by 2013, the Sons of
Iraq were virtually nonexistent". Sunnis formerly serving with the
group either became unemployed or joined the Islamic State of Iraq and
Syria.[4]
An interview with
a former leader of one group shows why it may be difficult for the US
to enlist their help in fighting the IS or ISIS, the aging general said:
If ISIS were to show up here, I would step aside and point them in the
direction of the Green Zone,” Shibib said, referring to the former
U.S.-run enclave in central Baghdad that is now the seat of the Iraqi
government. “If they have any quarrel, they can take it up with them.”
CENTCOM reports
that since August 8 the US has launched at least 340 airstrikes in Iraq
and Syria combined but almost three quarters were in Iraq. Few details
are usually given on aircraft used or numbers killed and wounded in the
strikes. While the US may be generous in providing airstrikes it is
stingy in providing refugee status. Journalists Lauren Gambino and Raya
Jalabi claim that the US only accepted 38 Syrian refugees in 2013.
While
US bombings may cause civilian deaths they no doubt are an
"improvement" over the bombing , including barrel bombs, and random
shelling of urban areas by
Iraqi government forces.
Other countries including Gulf States and Great Britain have
joined the US in the bombings. The appended video shows a UK airstrike.