Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australia. Show all posts

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Australia to launch $11.4 million program to infect carp with herpes virus

Australian Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce has told the Australian parliament that the only way to get rid of carp is to infect the fish with a form of the herpes virus.

Joyce described the carp as "disgusting, bottom-dwelling, mud-sucking creatures." Although infecting carp with herpes might seem like an overreaction, Carpagedon became official policy on May 1. While the carp was introduced into Australia long ago in 1859, it became a major problem only in the 1960s when a strain adapted for fishing farming accidentally was released. Christopher Pyne, Australia's Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science said: "The common carp is a nasty pest in our waterways and makes up 80 percent of fish biomass in the Murray Darling Basin." Joyce estimated the economic damage caused by carp is almost $400 million a year.
Another source puts the funding of the program at $15 million over two-and-a-half years but that is probably in Australian dollars. The money would be used to fund the National Carp Control Plan to undertake further research, approvals, and consultation for a comprehensive plan for a potential release of Cyprinid herpesvirus (carp herpesvirus) by the end of 2018 into selected Australian waterways:This virus, once known as koi herpesvirus, is now formally known as Cyprinid herpesvirus 3 (CyHV-3). Seven years of CSIRO research, supported by the Invasive Animals-Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), has shown that the use of CyHV-3 as a biocontrol agent could significantly reduce the number of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in our rivers.
The plan will aim at maximizing reduction in carp populations while minimizing disruption of communities, industry, and the environment.
The carp family has many different species including goldfish and koi that are often kept in aquariums or ponds as ornamental fish.. The herpes virus unfortunately appears to infect and kill all carp species. While many consider the carp a nuisance fish, others consider it a fine fish for angling. Even in the US there are organizations that promote carp fishing. As well as angling, carp are often targets of bow fishers. Even in 1653 Izaak Walton wrote in the Compleat Angler:"The Carp is the queen of rivers; a stately, a good, and a very subtle fish; that was not at first bred, nor hath been long in England, but is now naturalised."
While many regard the carp as a rough fish not to be used for food, in many parts of the world it is still a food fish and there are carp raised on fish farms. However, the herpes virus has wiped out some of these farms. The virus swept Europe last year. Carp production is a major form of aquaculture in Central, Eastern Europe and the Russian Federation. In Asia carp farming continues to be greater than the farmed fish volume of tuna and salmon.


Monday, February 15, 2016

Australia introduces bill to legalize medical marijuana

A bill was introduced in the Australian parliament on Wednesday that will allow the legal cultivation of marijuana for medical or scientific purposes.

The bill is designed to create a national licensing and permit regime that will eventually allow doctors to prescribe marijuana to patients with chronic pain on clinical trials. There are already several Australian states that have committed to cultivation of marijuana for medical and research purposes but they cannot do so because of federal laws that prohibit growing of the plant. As a result, manufacturers, researchers, and patients in these states on clinical trials must use international supplies of legal medicinal marijuana, often at considerable expense.
Australian Health Minister Sussan Ley said: "Allowing controlled cultivation locally will provide the critical missing piece for a sustainable legal supply of safe medicinal cannabis products for Australian patients in the future." Marijuana will not be available to the general public or other patients. Ley noted that marijuana was seen as beneficial for patients experiencing chronic pain:
Gaelan Bloomfield, manager at MMJ Phylo Tech Ltd. said:"The market for medicinal cannabis in Australia is substantial. The number of patients that could be targeted could be people with epilepsy, Multiple sclerosis, while there is the other spectrum of people with chronic pain."The company was the first listed medicinal medicinal marijuana company. Its initial public offering last year was three times oversubscribed. The main opposition party in Australia also has pledged support for the bill and so it is almost bound to become law. A survey by the Australian government in 2013 found 69 percent of those responding supported a change in the law to allow use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.
The use of marijuana for medicinal purposes is not new. In 2737 BC, Emperor Shen-Nung, also a pharmacologist wrote a book on treatment methods. He recommended marijuana for constipation, gout, rheumatism, and absent-mindedness. In traditional Chinese medicine, marijuana is one of 50 fundamental herbs. A government survey of 24,000 Australians nationwide found in 2013 that 69 percent of respondents supported a change of the law to permit cannabis use for medicinal purposes. Preparing to enter the Australian medicinal marijuana market are Dixie Elixirs in the US state of Colorado where recreational marijuana is already legal. The company makes cannabis edibles and topicals. As of mid-2014, 23 states plus the District of Columbia passed medical marijuana laws. More have joined since then. Many of the laws conflict with federal government regulations.
In Canada, there are Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations that make it legal to possess, consume, or grow marijuana under the conditions set out in the regulations. In November last year, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that the Liberal government intended to make marijuana legal for recreational use. Many medical authorities still oppose the use of marijuana and political authorities even more so. In 1936 a propaganda film against marijuana, Reefer Madness, was produced to warn youth not to use it. It does not seem to have worked but the film, which is appended, has become a cult classic.


Friday, January 15, 2016

Australian retailer recalls chairs that chop toes

Fantastic Furniture advertises itself as having "Australia's Best Value in Bedding and Furniture." However, after two recent incidents with its Worx chairs it has recalled them.

The retailer has sold almost 100,000 of the popular chairs. There have been two incidents, one in which an entire toe was lost, and another in which part of a toe was sliced off.
Mark Bulman, from Sydney, lost his middle toe on his left foot last April, after it became caught in the inner side of one of the legs of a Worx chair, when he tripped as he was coming to the aid of his toddler, Nate. The toe was sliced off by a sharp metal edge on the inside of the leg. He said at the time: “They should have recalled the chair straight away. But nothing was done and now someone else has been hurt.”He told reporters that he was still not used to being without the toe and was seeking compensation. However, even after the incident the chairs passed subsequent quality control tests. Competitors sell virtually identical chairs to the $39 dollar Fantastic chairs but so far none of them have chopped off anyone's toes.
A second incident involved an 11-year old boy of the Gold Coast area, Trae McGovern stubbed his left foot on one of the chairs at a weekend barbecue at a friend's house. He underwent reconstructive surgery at the Gold Coast University Hospital but the doctors were unable to reattach the part of his second toe that had been sliced. Traes' mother, Jaclyn Gross, has been pushing for a recall saying : "This could have been avoided if something had been done after the original accident." The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission asked Fantastic Furniture to recall the chairs. The chairs are no longer available for purchase on their website.
The CEO of Fantastic, Deborah Singh told reporters that cutting toes was a "potential issue'." The company has 74 stores across Australia. The chairs are all reproductions of a 1934-designed cafe chair called the Xavier Pauchard Tolix. The company is retrofitting the chairs with plugs inside the legs to prevent future accidents involving cut toes. Customers can either request their money back or have their chairs fitted with the plugs.


Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Qantas Airways shares hit record low on international operation losses



The flagship Australian air line has been experiencing heavy losses on international routes while still doing well domestically. The CEO Al Joyce said:"We have taken decisive action to mitigate losses in Qantas international by withdrawing from loss-making routes"

Quantas shares dropped 18 per cent at one time Tuesday to A $ 1.16 a record low.. Over the last 11 months the stock has lost forty per cent of its value.The high price of fuel over most of the period was part of the problem. However there has been fewer customers with the global slowdown especially in Europe..

The international business is predicted to lose more than A(Australian) $ 450 million during the last year. The loss this year will be the first since the carrier was privatized in 1995. In spite of the large international loss there was a substantial profit on domestic flights.

Qantas also suffered from labor battles that grounded their entire fleet for two days last October. However the CEO was optimistic:"We remain focused on returning Qantas international to profitability in 2014 and for Qantas international and domestic combined to exceed their cost of capital on a sustainable basis within five years of August 2011," For more see this article.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Australia tops Better Life Index rankings



Australia came up on top of the rankings in the Better Life Index of the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) Each of eleven categories were ranked in 36 countries.

In spite of the highest rankings the Labor government of Julia Gillard has low ratings in polls in Australia! However, the Index stats are excellent. Life expectancy is 82 years two years above the OECD average of 80. Employment is also well above the average.

After Australia the next best country is Norway. Coming in a respectable third is the U.S. in spite of having a relatively high unemployment rate. Canada is further behind coming sixth after fourth place Sweden and fifth place Denmark. Turkey was in last place.

The new scale was used beginning in 2011 as a way to measure well being of countries in more ways than simply economic growth. As well as income and education, the scale includes work-life balance and life satisfaction.

Canada shows increasing income inequality. The report notes::"In Canada, the [household net-adjusted disposable income] of the top 20 per cent of the population is 53,988 USD a year, whereas the bottom 20 per cent live on 10,077 USD a year." Canada does not fare well on work-life balance or civic engagement either.

The average voter participation in OECD countries is 73 per cent while Canada is just 61 per cent. For more see this article and also here.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Australia buries flawed Obama mugs Mafia style



An Australian Parliamentary official reported that 198 mugs featuring Barack Obama were destroyed because "Barack" was spelled "Barrack" The surprise is that the mugs were smashed and buried under wet concrete behind a loading dock. Shades of the Mafia!

The Australian government had made two hundred of the mugs to commemorate a visit to Australia by Obama in 2010. The visit never happened although he visited last year.

Only two mugs were ever sold from the Parliamentary gift shop. One was to a journalist who informed the shop that Obama's name was misspelled. Those two mugs would probably do well on eBay!

Bronwyn Graham a Parliament House official noted:"Due to the sensitivity associated with the mistake that was made with the president's name, the last thing we wanted was for the fragments to be found on a garbage tip somewhere," However it might have been better if the mugs had been cremated or put through some sort of shredder! Or perhaps they could all have been offered one by one on eBay to help reduce the Australian debt. For more see this article.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

U.S. marines arrive in Darwin Australia



Two hundred U.S. marines landed in the north-western Australian port of Darwin. They will be there on a six month rotation and will take part in joint exercises with Australian forces.

As part of the U.S. imperial design to contain China and devote more resources to the rapidly developing South East Asia area the U.S. will raise its presence in Australia to 2,500 by 2017. Of course the U.S. and Australia vehemently deny the strengthened ties and troop deployment have anything to do with China.

The Australia defence minister Stephen Smith who welcomed the troops also said that the mood in the area was ''one of very strong enthusiasm''. Julia Gillard the Prime Minister downplayed the increase in U.S. troops claiming that the Marine deployment was''an evolution of existing exercises and activities'' between the two countries and the continuation of a sixty year security relationship with the U.S.

This is the first time the United States has committed to a permanent rotation of its forces through Australia. The U.S. already has bases in South Korea, Japan, Guam and will probably send more troops to countries such as the Philippines as well.

After Australian officials denied the move has anything to do with China the Australian defence minister said the troops were needed because Australia (and the U.S. no doubt) had to come to grips with the rise of India and China and the increase in political and economic clout of the region. There are reports as well that Australia may grant permission for a U.S. air base on Australian islands in the Indian Ocean.

The base would be in the Cocos Islands. It would allow drone and other flights into the region. Australian officials claimed these plans were long term and down the track. As of now they said there are no U.S. bases in Australia. For more see this article.

Although the U.S. move may irritate China trade between the two countries is unlikely to suffer. China is Australia's largest trading partner and hence the attempts to assure China that the deployment has nothing to do with containing China. What would the U.S think if China had bases in Canada, Mexico, Cuba etc.?

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Australia: Labor party soundly defeated in Queensland state election


Anna Bligh leader of the Queensland Labor Party has resigned after a crushing defeat for her party in the Queensland election. Labor's vote share was dropping to about 27 per cent from about 43 per cent.

The triumphant Liberal National Party received almost 50 per cent of the vote up over 8 per cent. The increase for the LNP and decline for Labor resulted in a probable 7 seats for Labor and 78 for the LNP,. Results were not final when this report was issued by ABC news.

This is the Queensland Labor Party's worst ever defeat. Anna Bligh is resigning from parliament as well. She said:"I will be standing aside as the leader of the Labor Party and further I will be resigning as the member for South Brisbane," Most likely successors to Bligh were defeated in the election although Bligh had kept her own seat. Nine Labor government ministers were defeated.

The new premier elect is Campbell Newman. Newman was gracious in his remarks about Bligh:"I thank her for her service to Queensland... I particularly again pay tribute to her fantastic leadership during Cyclone Yasi and the floods. She did do a tremendous job and she needs to always be remembered for that,"

One of Newman's key goals is to reach a 4 per cent unemployment rate. He pledged also to cut waste and inefficiency in the government. The devastating defeat may cause concern federally as the Labor Party is the government at present. For more see this article.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Australia imposes 30 per cent tax on iron ore and coal mine profits



The government has been fighting for two years with mining companies over the level of new taxes. The Green party which supports the Labor bill wanted to raise the rate to 40 per cent and include other mining groups. The Labor Party too originally had planned for a 40 per cent tax rate on mining.

Passage of the laws represents a great win for Julia Gillard the prime minister. She passed the laws in spite of leading a minority government. Green Party members helped.

The taxes will hit some industry giants including Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton, and Xstrata. The tax will generate 11.2 billion (U.S.) in revenue over the first three years.

Gillard said in defense of the bill:"Australians know how important the mining industry is, but they also know that we can only dig up and sell the resources once," "The Minerals Resource Rent Tax will deliver Australians with a fair return on the resources they own 100 per cent.""The Gillard government believes all Australians should share in the benefits of the mining boom, not just a fortunate few,"

Mining groups oppose the tax. In particular small and medium size mining groups complained that the tax was so complicated that compliance with the terms would be difficult and expensive for smaller and medium size mines. For more see this article.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard gets an A plus on report





The Australian Graduate School of Management released the report to mark International Women's Day. Gillard is Australia's first female prime minister.

The School gave her an A plus for conflict management, legislative change, and her relations with the public service. The report applauded Gillard for her ability in managing a minority government and being able to pass a great deal of legislation in a short time in spite of being in a minority.

However many are critical of Gillard. Her handling of a mining tax and carbon tax have been widely criticized. The report said that Gillard was judged more harshly than her male counterparts.

Recently Kevin Rudd resigned from the government and plans to run against her for leadership of the Labour Party. I doubt he would give Gillard an A plus. He wants to give her the boot! For more see this ABC article .

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Severe flooding in some Australian states




While the situation in Australia is nowhere as disastrous as the parts of the U.S. hit by tornadoes, there is bad weather in parts of the country with severe flooding.

Thousands of residents in the state of New South Wales have been ordered to evacuate their homes and one person died due to the floods. 70 per cent of New South Wales has been affected by days of heavy rains. Several communities are inundated by flood waters as can be seen in the appended video.

Water is spilling over several dams and threatening communities downstream. A number of towns are cut off from the outside as roads are washed out. Flooding is taking place in Victoria state as well as New South Wales. For more see this article.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

As Australia Dries a Global Shortage of Rice

This is from IHT.
When thinking of rice production Australia does not come to mind--but neither does the US that also produces quite a bit. It seems that simple economics rather than the drought is the prime cause of production decline. With the huge difference in income from grape production vis-a-vis rice it makes much more sense to produce grapes on land formerly used for rice where that is possible.



As Australia dries, a global shortage of rice
By Keith Bradsher

Thursday, April 17, 2008
DENILIQUIN, Australia: Lindsay Renwick, the mayor of this dusty southern Australian town, remembers the constant whir of the rice mill. "It was our little heartbeat out there, tickety-tick-tickety," he said, imitating the giant fans that dried the rice, "and now it has stopped."

The Deniliquin mill, the largest rice mill in the Southern Hemisphere, once processed enough grain to satisfy the daily needs of 20 million people. But six long years of drought have taken a toll, reducing Australia's rice crop by 98 percent and leading to the mothballing of the mill last December.

Ten thousand miles separate the mill's hushed rows of oversized silos and sheds — beige, gray and now empty — from the riotous streets of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, but a widening global crisis unites them.

The collapse of Australia's rice production is one of several factors contributing to a doubling of rice prices in the last three months — increases that have led the world's largest exporters to restrict exports severely, spurred panicked hoarding in Hong Kong and the Philippines, and set off violent protests in countries including Cameroon, Egypt, Ethiopia, Haiti, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Mauritania, the Philippines, Thailand, Uzbekistan and Yemen.

Drought affects every agricultural industry based here, not just rice — from sheepherding, the other mainstay in this dusty land, to the cultivation of wine grapes, the fastest-growing crop here, with that expansion often coming at the expense of rice.

The drought's effect on rice has produced the greatest impact on the rest of the world, so far. It is one factor contributing to skyrocketing prices, and many scientists believe it is among the earliest signs that a warming planet is starting to affect food production.

While a link between short-term changes in weather and long-term climate change is not certain, the unusually severe drought is consistent with what climatologists predict will be a problem of increasing frequency.

Indeed, the chief executive of the National Farmers' Federation in Australia, Ben Fargher, says, "Climate change is potentially the biggest risk to Australian agriculture."

Drought has already spurred significant changes in Australia's agricultural heartland. Some farmers are abandoning rice, which requires large amounts of water, to plant less water-intensive crops like wheat or, especially here in southeastern Australia, wine grapes. Other rice farmers have sold their fields or their water rights, usually to grape growers.

Scientists and economists worry that the reallocation of scarce water resources — away from rice and other grains and toward more lucrative crops and livestock — threatens poor countries that import rice as a dietary staple.

The global agricultural crisis is threatening to become a political one, pitting the United States and other developed countries against the developing world over the need for affordable food versus the need for renewable energy. Many poorer nations worry that subsidies from rich countries to support biofuels, which turn food, like corn, into fuel, are pushing up the price of staplesThe World Bank and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization both called on major agricultural countries to overhaul policies to avoid a social explosion from rising food prices.

With rice, which is not used to make biofuel, the problem is availability. Even in normal times, little of the world's rice is actually exported — more than 90 percent is consumed in the countries where it is grown. In the last quarter-century, rice consumption has outpaced production, with global reserves plunging by half just since 2000. Current economic uncertainty has led producers to hoard rice and speculators and investors even see it as a lucrative, or at least safe, investment.

All these factors have made countries that buy rice on the global market vulnerable to extreme price swings.

Senegal and Haiti each import four-fifths of their rice. And both have faced mounting unrest as prices have increased. Police suppressed violent demonstrations in Dakar on March 30, and unrest has spread to other rice-dependent nations in West Africa, notably Ivory Coast. The Haitian president, René Préval, after a week of riots, announced subsidies for rice buyers on Saturday.

Scientists expect the problem to worsen in the decades ahead.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, set up by the United Nations, predicted last year that even slight warming would decrease agricultural output in tropical and subtropical countries.

Moderate warming could benefit crop and pasture yields in countries far from the Equator, like Canada and Russia. In fact, the net effect of moderate warming is likely to be higher total food production around the world in the next several decades.

But the scientists said the effect would be uneven, and enormous quantities of food would need to be shipped from areas farther from the Equator to feed the populations of often less-affluent countries closer to the Equator.

The panel predicted that even greater warming, which might happen by late in this century if few or no limits are placed on greenhouse gas emissions, would hurt total food output and cripple crops in many countries.

Paul Lamine N'Dong, an elder in Joal, Senegal, worries that hot weather and failing rains have already crippled his village's crop of millet, a coarse grain eaten locally and traded for rice.

Sitting on a concrete dais reserved for elders, N'Dong said on a recent morning, "The price rises very quickly, which means we really have to go and look for money."

"It is live or die," he said.

Survival Techniques

For farmers in a richer nation like Australia the effects of the current drought are already significant.

The rice farmers who do not give up and sell their land or water rights are experimenting with varieties or techniques that require less water. Australia now has some of the world's highest rice yields for a given quantity of water.

Still, Australia's total rice capacity has declined by about a third because many farmers have permanently sold water rights, mostly for grape production. And production last year was far lower because of a severe shortage of water; rice farmers received one-eighth of the water they are usually promised by the government.

The accidental beneficiaries of these conditions have been the farmers who grow wine grapes in the same river basin where the Deniliquin mill stands silent.

Even with the recent doubling of rice prices, to around $1,000 a metric ton for the high grades produced by Australia, it is even more profitable to grow wine grapes.

All told, wine grapes produce a pretax profit of close to $2,000 an acre while rice produces a pretax profit around $240 an acre.

Ranchers like Peter Milliken, who raises sheep on 37,500 acres near Hay, Australia, are trying to reduce the water they use. Milliken is installing a buried nine-mile pipe to replace an irrigation canal that lost up to 90 percent of its water to evaporation — and planning for the day when he does not irrigate at all.

Sheep farmers have already worked out cooperative arrangements to send flocks to whatever fields have recently received rain, sometimes herding or trucking them long distances. Keeping an eye on a flock, Frank Cox, a drover, said recently, "We had to move the sheep because they were dying of starvation, and truck them down here."

The changes here are making rice harder to find.

For instance, SunRice, the Australian rice trading and marketing giant owned by the country's rice growers, began preparing to mothball the Deniliquin mill five months ago, when it noticed that Australian farmers were planting almost no rice. To make sure that it could continue supplying the domestic market, as well as export markets in Papua New Guinea, South Pacific island nations, Taiwan and the Middle East, SunRice went into international markets and stepped up rice purchases from other countries, the chief executive, Gary Helou, said

The SunRice purchases became one among the many factors that are making it harder for longtime rice importers elsewhere to find supplies.

Seeking Hardier Rice

Researchers are looking for solutions to global rice shortages — for example, rice that blooms earlier in the day, when it is cooler, to counter global warming. Rice plants that happen to bloom on hot days are less likely to produce grains of rice, a difficulty that is already starting to emerge in inland areas of China and other Asian countries as temperatures begin to climb.

"There will be problems very soon unless we have new varieties of rice in place," said Reiner Wassmann, climate change coordinator at the International Rice Research Institute near Manila, a leader in developing higher-yielding strains of rice for nearly half a century.

The recent reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change carried an important caveat that could make the news even worse: the panel said that existing models for the effects of climate change on agriculture did not yet include newer findings that global warming could reduce rainfall and make it more variable.

Many agronomists contend that changes in the timing and amount of rain are more important for crops than temperature changes. Rajendra Pachauri, the chairman of the panel, said long-range climate forecasts for precipitation would require another 5 to 20 years of research, depending on the region.

In addition to drought, climate change could also produce more extreme weather, more outbreaks of pests and weeds, and changes in sea level as polar ices melts. Most of the world's increase in rice production over the last quarter-century has occurred close to sea level, in the deltas of rivers like the Mekong in Vietnam, Chao Phraya in Thailand and Ganges-Brahmaputra in Bangladesh.

Yet the effects of climate change are not uniformly bad for rice. Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, can actually help rice plants and other crops — although the effect dwindles or disappears if the plants face excessive heat, inadequate water, severe pollution or other stresses.

Still, the flexibility of farmers and ranchers here has persuaded some climate experts that, particularly in developed countries, the effects of climate change may be mitigated, if not completely avoided.

"I'm not as pessimistic as most people," said Will Steffen, the director of the Fenner School of Environment and Society at Australian National University. "Farmers are learning how to do things differently."

Meanwhile, changes like the use of water to grow wine grapes instead of rice carry their own costs, as the developing world is discovering.

"Rice is a staple food," said Graeme Haley, the general manager of the town of Deniliquin. "Chardonnay is not."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2008 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com

Friday, January 25, 2008

Howard government neglected Australian public housing crisis.

Of course Howard certainly didn't neglect to show his loyalty to his comrade Bush by spending money to send troops to serve in Iraq.


Govt slams predecessor on public housing

January 24, 2008 - 9:47AMThe federal government has accused its coalition predecessor of neglectfollowing the release of new reports showing almost 180,000 people are onwaiting lists for public housing.The reports - from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - alsoreveal there are 333,085 households living in public rental dwellings,33,557 in community housing and 12,622 in indigenous housing.Federal Housing Minister Tanya Plibersek said a third of those on publichousing waiting lists were waiting more than two years for a place.She said more people than ever were in need of affordable housing."Many low-income working families are now missing out on social housingaltogether," she said."The previous government's decade of neglect means that now the mostdisadvantaged Australians are waiting longer than ever just to get a roofover their heads."Ms Plibersek said the former Howard government had cut $3.1 billion fromsocial housing in real terms during its time in office."These funding cuts mean that low-income working families are finding itharder than ever to get affordable housing."(It) has forced the states and territories to target the provision ofsocial housing even more tightly to those in greatest need."Ms Plibersek said Australian Bureau of Statistics data showed that in 1995,22 per cent of applicants for social housing were accommodated."Ten years later, only 14 per cent were able to move off waiting lists andinto housing."These are the same working Australians suffering rapid increases in rentwhich grew by 6.4 per cent in 2007 - more than double the rate of inflation.Ms Plibersek offered no "silver bullets" to housing affordability but said anational rental affordability scheme would increase, by 50,000, the numberof suitable properties.© 2008 AAPBrought to you by aaphttp://news.theage.com.au/govt-slams-predecessor-on-public-housing/20080124-1nrf.html#

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Australia urges US to sign on to Kyoto

The US may be the only industrialized country to refuse the binding targets of Kyoto but Canada has signed on only to do nothing much under the Liberals while emissions rose and now under the Conservatives we have a follow the US lead backwards regime. At least Australia has signed on to Kyoto and not followed the US lead as Howard did.
It seems that while the US and other developed countries want the developing countries to sign on to emission reductions they are unwilling to provide the clean technologies or cash to help them adjust to climate change requirements.

Rudd urges the United States to ratify Kyoto
The Associated PressPublished: December 5, 2007




BALI, Indonesia: Prime Minister Kevin Rudd of Australia urged the United States on Wednesday to follow his country's lead and ratify the Kyoto Protocol, as divisions emerged over what a future international climate change pact should look like.

Rudd signed documents this week to formally adopt the Kyoto accord, reversing a decade of resistance and leaving the United States as the only industrialized country to refuse its binding targets for greenhouse gas emissions.

"Our position vis-à-vis Kyoto is clear cut, and that is that all developed and developing countries need to be part of the global solution," the newly elected prime minister told the Southern Cross Broadcasting radio network in Australia.

"And therefore we do need to see the United States as a full ratification state."

His comments further put the United States on the defensive at the Bali Climate Change conference, where nearly 190 nations aim to launch two years of serious negotiations on a future regime to head off dangerous climate change.
Birth centennial of Lin Biao, once second only to Mao, a nonevent

Scientists warn that a strong new deal is needed to ward off everything from severe droughts and floods, to melting ice caps and rising sea levels, to deaths linked to heat waves and disease.

The 175-nation Kyoto Protocol of 1997 requires 36 industrialized nations to reduce their emissions of "greenhouse gases" - carbon dioxide and some other industrial, agricultural and transportation byproducts - by an average 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

The United States says it wants to be part of the negotiations on a follow-up accord but refuses to endorse mandatory cuts in emissions favored by the European Union.

Although the Bali conference is in its early days, differences already are emerging mostly over what should go into the "Bali road map" which will lay out the subjects for discussions. Japan, for one, offered up a proposal that does not include targets, while the EU has come out with a detailed wish list that includes demands for industrialized countries to take the lead in cutting emissions.

Meanwhile, delegates and activists say that poor countries led by the Group of 77, which represents 132 mainly developing countries and China, have been kicking up a storm over demands that rich countries provide them with clean technologies and funds to adapt to the impacts of global warming.

Rudd's Labor Party swept to power last month, ending more than 11 years of conservative rule under former Prime Minister John Howard, a staunch ally of President George W. Bush.

Signing the Kyoto documents was Rudd's first official act. The policy switch was greeted by applause at the Bali conference when it opened.

Monday, November 26, 2007

New Australian PM signals Iraq pullout.

I don't know why Rudd would be called a Tone Clone. Perhaps it is his Third Way policies modeled after UK labor. However, Rudd will pull out from Iraq and will sign onto Kyoto moves that will hardly please Bush et al. I doubt that Blair is a republican. I expect that he supported the monarchy!! This is from the Times on Line.

New Australian PM signals Iraq pulloutPaul Ham, Sydney
AUSTRALIA’S new prime minister Kevin Rudd will mark his arrival on the international stage by announcing the withdrawal of his country’s combat troops from Iraq and signing the Kyoto treaty on climate change.

Rudd, a republican and former diplomat, swept to power as his Labor party stormed to a landslide victory in yesterday’s elections.

Official figures showed Labor had won more than 53% of the vote, compared with just under 47% for the ruling Liberal coalition of John Howard, who had served four terms as prime minister but lost his seat. Computer projections forecast that Labor would secure 86 seats in the 150-seat lower house of parliament.

Rudd, 50, who has been called a “Tone Clone” for his similarities to Tony Blair on policy, told cheering supporters that the electorate had decided to “write a new page in our nation’s history”.

Howard, who dominated Australia’s political scene for more than a decade, was accused of misreading the mood of voters who wanted change despite a booming economy.

Clearly shaken by the scale of the defeat Howard, 68, told demoralised supporters that he may soon retire. “This is a great democracy and I want to wish Mr Rudd well,” Howard said. “We bequeath to him a nation that is stronger and prouder and more prosperous than it was 11½ years ago.”

While Howard is a monarchist, Rudd favours a plebiscite on the question of whether the Queen should remain head of state. As one of his first acts, Rudd plans to bring home most Australian troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, both deeply unpopular wars.

Gordon Brown telephoned from the Commonwealth heads of government meeting in Kampala, the Ugandan capital, to congratulate Rudd, who emphasised his determination to reverse Australia’s long-standing resistance to the Kyoto treaty

and told Brown he would work hard to achieve a fresh agreement at an international climate change conference in Bali next month.

Rudd’s deputy prime minister will be Julia Gillard, 46, who emigrated with her parents from Barry, South Glamorgan, 41 years ago.

The daughter of a retired policeman, she trained as a lawyer and first came to public attention as leader of the Australian Union of Students. She is now the most powerful woman in Australian politics.

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Australia's PM-elect Rudd vows better global ties

Perhaps Rudd will better ties with some other countries but the US ties may be strained to say the least. Rudd will sign on to Kyoto and withdraw troops from Iraq. Domestically he will have more pro-labor parties. Labor is also in power in the six Australian states.


Australia's PM-elect Rudd vows better global ties
Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:02 PM EST



By Rob Taylor

BRISBANE (Reuters) - Incoming Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, a Mandarin-speaking former diplomat, has pledged closer Australian ties with overseas allies and unity at home after ending 11 years of conservative rule under John Howard.

Rudd, 50, presented himself as a new-generation leader by promising to pull about 500 frontline Australian troops out of Iraq and sign the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, further isolating Washington on both issues.

"To our friends and allies around the world, I look forward as the next Prime Minister of Australia to working with them in dealing with the great challenges which our world now faces," he told cheering supporters at a victory party late on Saturday.

The surge to Labor left Howard battling to win even his own parliamentary seat, which he has held since 1974. He was in danger of becoming the first prime minister since 1929 to lose his constituency.

As part of Rudd's promised "fresh thinking," he also teamed with a female deputy, former lawyer Julia Gillard, who will be Australia's first woman deputy prime minister.

"King Kevin the new conqueror," said the Sun-Herald newspaper in Howard's home town of Sydney on Sunday. "It's Labor in a Ruddslide," said the national newspaper the Australian.

Up to six government ministers, including Howard, looked likely to be ejected in only the sixth change of government since World War Two. Labor is set to hold up to 86 seats in the 150-seat parliament.

Rudd is expected to forge closer ties with China and other Asian nations and has said he wants a more independent voice in foreign policy, with past Labor governments more supportive of an energetic United Nations and global organizations.

U.S. TIES

But he has also promised to maintain Australia's close alliance with the United States as the cornerstone of Australia's foreign and strategic policy.

"Rudd will have to open negotiations soon with the United States about the withdrawal of Australia's combat troops from Iraq. This is a delicate operation because it will be Labor's first testing of the alliance," veteran political commentator Michelle Grattan wrote in the Sun-Herald.

President George W. Bush congratulated Rudd on his election victory, and praised Howard's leadership.

"The United States and Australia have long been strong partners and allies and the president looks forward to working with this new government to continue our historic relationship," the White House said in a statement.

Rudd promised to sign the Kyoto climate pact immediately and lead his country's delegation to next month's U.N. climate summit in Bali, which is expected to kick-start talks on a post-Kyoto deal to slash greenhouse gas emissions globally.

He also pledged unity at home, vowing to shut down controversial offshore detention of illegal immigrants and to take care of Aborigines in the wake of a conservative intervention to seize control of remote indigenous communities with troops and police.

"I will be a prime minister for all Australians, a prime minister for indigenous Australians, Australians who have been born here and Australians who have come here from afar," he said.

Family Minister Mal Brough, responsible for the Aboriginal intervention to stop rampant sexual abuse of children and "rivers of grog" in remote outback towns, was a high-profile casualty of the Labor win, losing his Queensland seat.

HOSTILE SENATE

But Labor could be frustrated by a hostile upper house. The conservatives will have a Senate majority until July next year, possibly delaying Rudd's agenda and his promise to dump unpopular labor laws which supercharged his victory.

Centre-left Labor will have to negotiate with diverse minor Senate parties including the left-leaning Australian Greens and the conservative, Christian values Family First party.

The election was fought mainly on domestic issues, with Labor cashing in on anger at labor laws and rising interest rates which put home owners under financial pressure at a time when Australia's economy is booming.

The result puts Labor in power nationally and in all of Australia's six states and two territories. The lord mayor of the northern city of Brisbane is now the senior-ranking elected official in Howard's Liberal Party.

Outgoing Foreign Minister Alexander Downer glumly said it had been hard for the conservative government to present itself as fresh and new after more than 11 years, despite 16 years of economic expansion and unemployment at 33-year lows.

"I think at the end of the day, people just thought it was time for a change," Downer told local television on Sunday.

(Additional reporting by James Grubel in Sydney, editing by Roger Crabb)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Reuters 2007. All rights reserved.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Australia's Howard calls election for Nov. 24.

It looks as if Bush may lose one of his big buddies. Not to worry he still has Harper here in Canada and Sarkozy in France and to some extent Brown in the UK. The opposition will bring home Aussies from Iraq and sign Kyoto if they win.

Australia's veteran Prime Minister John Howard on Sunday called a
national
election for November 24, stressing experience over his Labor opponent
and
shrugging off polls that show he faces near-certain defeat.

Howard, 68, in power for 11 years but lagging well behind youthful
Labor leader
Kevin Rudd in opinion surveys, said that only he was able to lead
Australia
into the future and continue the country's current resource-driven
economic
boom.

"Love me or loath me the Australian people know where I stand on all
the major
issues of importance to their future," said Howard, who is danger of
losing in
his own Sydney-based seat.

Howard, Australia's second-longest serving leader, said the country was
enjoying remarkable prosperity, but promised voters the best years
could lie
ahead.

"But that won't happen automatically. This country does not need new
leadership, it does not need old leadership, it needs the right
leadership," he
said, unveiling what will likely become the conservatives' fighting
slogan.

But if Howard wins he has already said he will hand over the prime
ministership
to his deputy, Treasurer Peter Costello, some time during the next
term.

The election will determine the future of Canberra's military
contribution in
Iraq and climate change stance, with Labor promising to bring home
combat
troops and sign the Kyoto climate pact. But the poll will be fought and
won on
domestic issues.

GENERATIONAL CHANGE

Rudd, 50, has promised generational change to take the country into the
future,
including sweeping reforms to healthcare, education and controversial
labor
laws introduced by Howard.

"What I'm offering the Australian people is new leadership," Rudd said.
"Australia can't afford another three years of a government which has
already
had 11 years ... a government without fresh ideas for our nation's
future."

A newspaper opinion poll on Sunday gave Labor 59 percent of the overall
vote,
compared with the coalition government's 41 percent. But Labor needs to
pick up
an imposing 16 more seats in the 150-seat lower house to take power.
full:http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071014/wl_nm/australia_politics_dc_5;_ylt=Agwb0SWTHEwxA7rGaJGZHCFkMfQI

Friday, September 14, 2007

John Howard says he will retire part way through next term.

Perhaps Bush will invite Howard to his Texas ranch for a big holiday party. It sounds as if Labor might finally be coming back in strength in Australia so Howard may find himself forced into retirement after the next election.


Howard signals end to political career
By Peter Smith in Sydney

Published: September 13 2007 11:15 | Last updated: September 13 2007 11:15

John Howard has called an end to his political career after saying he would retire as Australia’s second-longest serving prime minister part way through his next term if he wins an election due to be held by early December.

The decision comes after one of the most tumultuous periods of his 11-year premiership and as his personal standing and that of the ruling Liberal/National party coalition trails a resurgent opposition Labor party under Kevin Rudd.

Mr Howard had hoped for a political boost from Australia’s hosting of 21 world leaders from Pacific Rim economies at the weekend’s Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (Apec) meeting. He has instead been repeatedly forced to deny he planned to step aside after losing support from within party ranks, following damaging displays of disunity from senior cabinet ministers.

But after a meeting with his Liberal party colleagues this week when his leadership went unchallenged, Mr Howard announced he would step down before 2010 after his election agenda was in place, and anointed Peter Costello, treasurer, to succeed him.

He said it would not be easy to retire after being re-elected.

“I won’t find it the least bit easy because I am very committed to this job and I will not like leaving it. But everything comes to an end.”

Labor seized on his comments, pointing out that Australians were being asked to vote for a leader who planned to retire. Mr Rudd said Mr Howard could no longer govern his own party let alone the country.

Andrew Macintosh, deputy director of Australia Institute, a Canberra-based think tank, said Mr Howard had been “dragged kicking and screaming” to make the announcement against his own political judgement.

“It seems terminal,” he said. “He is running out of time to call an election, the polling is terrible, there has been continued speculation over his leadership and now he says he wants to hand over to a disastrously unpopular Peter Costello.”

“To say you plan to resign and anoint Peter Costello is a bad political strategy,” he said.

Wayne Errington, a political science lecturer at Australian National University and Howard biographer, said up until last week Mr Howard could have stared down insurrection from within his party but it was now clear senior ministers no longer wanted him in the job.

“He has had to change his form of words from what he’s previously said, which was he will stay as long as the party wanted him.”

In 2000, Mr Howard said he would contemplate retirement when he reached 64 but as that date drew nearer a few years later he said he would stay as long as he had the party’s support, a phrase he has used ever since.

“He has come under more and more pressure from Costello and he has been forced to address issues that he would rather have left ambiguous,” Mr Errington said.

Mr Howard, 68, is seeking a fifth term in office. He has a reputation as a doughty political survivor and unexpectedly toppled Paul Keating’s Labor government in 1996.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Australia gives Philippines low marks in governance, peace, reforms

This is from the Tribune Although much of this analysis is likely correct I think that in some cases economic growth may very well exacerbate income inequality and even produce poverty for some. I get the gut feeling that the Australian commentators want reforms that will open the Philippines to more foreign investment. The main reforms should have to do with corruption but the filipinos also need to curb the power of the leading rich families who manage to control the system. That the Philippines still has controls on foreign ownership of land and investment is not necessarily a bad thing, it is just that it is used to protect the elite rather than to advance the interest of all filipinos.

Australia gives RP low marks in governance, peace, reforms



07/25/2007

Australia has cited lack of good governance, restoring peace and security and slow economic reforms as the greatest challenges currently facing the Philippines.

In its May 2007 bilateral overview, the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the Philippines is gripped by a number of difficult economic and social challenges.

“The Philippines, despite generally favorable human development indicators, has not matched its economic potential. Lack of sustained growth over the past 30 years has seen it lag behind the achievements of many of its East and Southeast Asian neighbors in reducing poverty. Another major challenge has been the ongoing instability in southern Philippines, which has impacted on long-term and broad-based development,” the report added.

Unlike many of its neighbors, Australia said the Philippines has not experienced a recent or sustained period of rapid economic growth.

“As a consequence, there has not been the sharp decline in poverty that has occurred in faster-growing economies,” it added.

It noted that the country has been gradually overtaken by most of its neighbors, first by South Korea and Taiwan, then Thailand, and more recently Indonesia for a period, and China.

“The Philippines continues to juggle extremely limited budgetary resources





while attempting to meet the needs of a rapidly expanding population,” the report said.

It added the situation of the Philippines is “volatile and there are signs of poor performance in a range of areas.”

“The new (Arroyo) administration, elected in May 2004 for a six-year term, faces the challenge of implementing essential policy reforms, particularly in areas affecting globalization and trade liberalization,” the report said.

It added a tenuous peace process in Mindanao, the reemergence of the communist New People’s Army (NPA) as a serious threat to stability in various parts of the country, including Mindanao, and other internal security issues, also threaten to exacerbate this fragility.

Poverty, according to the report, remains a significant problem.

Combined with inequality, Australia said poverty poses a serious threat to stability in the Philippines.

“The number of people living on less than US$1 a day increased from 27 million in 1997 to 31 million, of a total population of 76 million, in 2000. In addition, the Philippines has one of the highest levels of income inequality in Asia, with the poorest 20 per cent of the population accounting for only five per cent of total income or consumption,” the report also noted.

Australia observed that poverty in the Philippines is predominantly rural and, although variable by region, is pervasive in southern Philippines, particularly Mindanao.

“Poor productivity growth in agriculture, under-investment in rural infrastructure, unequal land and income distribution, high population growth and the low quality of social services lie at the root of rural poverty,” it said.

The report said natural disasters, the risks associated with variable markets and the persistence of armed conflict in Mindanao also threaten to deepen existing disparities by disrupting growth and exacerbating poverty. Michaela P. del Callar

Monday, June 18, 2007

Turning a deaf ear to suffering

It isn't really a question of turning a deaf ear to suffering. It is turning a deaf ear to wrongdoing by one's own government or thinking that torture was justified somehow by the war on terror, or that it would be wrong to "tie the hands" of those doing dirty work to supposedly keep us safe. It is turning a blind eye to the fact that terror suspects are denied legal protections that are supposed to be part of basic human rights in democracies.

Turning a deaf ear to suffering
Email Print Normal font Large font Nina Philadelphoff-Puren
June 16, 2007

The Australian Government is in denial about its role in the torture of one of its citizens, writes Nina Philadephoff-Puren.

PRIMO Levi, the great witness to the Holocaust, was plagued by a recurring nightmare while in Auschwitz. It would begin as an innocent dream. In it, he is sitting at a table with people who know him. With intense relief, he tells them of all that

had happened during his imprisonment: beatings, hunger, unspeakable suffering. But as his tale unfolds, he notices something dreadful — his audience is no longer paying attention. Unbearably, they have turned away from him, indifferent to his story. And at this point, Levi's nightmare begins: the nightmare of finally uttering his testimony, only to find that his listeners refuse to hear it.

This story highlights the moral responsibility of political communities to listen to those who allege that they have suffered terrible crimes. In the so-called war on terror, some communities have shown they can do this better than others. Consider the case of Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen. He was tortured for a year in Syria after being taken into United States custody in New York. He was beaten, interrogated and made to sign false confessions, after a long confinement in a tiny cell that he described as "a grave". On his return to Canada without charge, he provided detailed testimony to Amnesty International about his deportation and incarceration. This led to a public inquiry into his allegations only four months later, which resulted in Arar receiving compensation and an apology from the Canadian Government.

In providing a public examination of his claims, the Canadians fulfilled their responsibility as ethical listeners. The Arar case begs comparison with Mamdouh Habib, detained in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere for more than three years without charge, before his release to Australia in January 2005.

Consider the following attempts to make Habib fall silent. Former Opposition Leader Kim Beazley opposed his request to address a Senate committee about his experiences in Guantanamo Bay. Former Education Minister Brendan Nelson condemned a university for permitting

him to speak to students about what had happened to him. Three men in Sydney stabbed him outside his home, saying only that "you better keep quiet".

This is a man possessed of dangerous words. Our democratic instincts should be aroused by these efforts to stop us hearing them. As the ABC's Four Corners program Ghost Prisoners revealed this week, the story he has to tell goes to the heart of our democratic society and its integrity.

Habib was arrested as a terrorist suspect in October 2001 and interrogated in Pakistan before being rendered to Egypt. He reports that he was then tortured for months: beaten, threatened with dogs and electric cattle-prods, locked in a tiny box and kept for hours in a room that was filled with water up to his chin. By the time he was transferred to Guantanamo Bay the following May, he was diagnosed with

post-traumatic stress disorder.

What is chilling about this story is that Habib says that an Australian official was present during at least one of his interrogation sessions, a claim the Government denies. Habib insists his Egyptian interrogators relied on information ASIO officers had taken from his house in Sydney.

As the Four Corners program indicated, this all raises disturbing and frankly disorienting questions. The Australian Government repeatedly said it could not confirm that Habib was in Egypt. Documents revealed on the Four Corners program suggest otherwise. It is clear that officers of both the Australian Federal Police and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade knew exactly where he was. If the Government knew that an Australian citizen was there, it should have rung alarm bells. It sends a chill down the spine to think that they did nothing.

Habib is currently suing the Commonwealth in the Federal Court, claiming that the Government was complicit in his kidnap, false imprisonment and torture. The Government has tried to have his case struck out. Beyond the serious legal ramifications of this situation, the cruelty of the official obfuscations in this matter cannot be overstated. It is well known that torture attacks the voice as well as the body. A key aspect in any torture survivor's recovery is the ability to tell their story and have it acknowledged. Years of government denials have deprived Habib of that recognition.

Against enormous odds, Mamdouh Habib continues to speak out about his ordeal. His testimony is troubling, disruptive and no doubt inconvenient. His claims strike at the heart of the integrity of our institutions, our relationship with the US and our conduct in the "war on terror".

Dr Nina Philadelphoff-Puren is a lecturer in the school of English, communications and performance studies at Monash University.

US will bank Tik Tok unless it sells off its US operations

  US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said during a CNBC interview that the Trump administration has decided that the Chinese internet app ...