In spite of the fact that General McChrystal has emphasized that civilian deaths should be avoided there seems to be continual events such as mentioned in this article in which civilians are killed in one way or another. The result is as the article points out protests and a growing anti-NATO and anti-U.S. feeling. Of course in this case Kandahar is also a place where the Taliban have a strong following. But the way things are going there seems little chance that NATO is going to have the majority of the population on their side. More likely many will help the Taliban counterattack when NATO tries to rule the town with its chosen puppets. This is from antiwar.com.
Posted By Jason Ditz
Who knew that opening fire on a busload of innocent civilians would be such a hot-button issue?
The US was quick to take responsbility today, and NATO was quick to express regrets, but the attack earlier today on a civilian bus, leaving five civilians dead and 18 others wounded, sparking protests and later riots.
Hundreds took to the streets, chanting “death to America,” burning tires, blocking the main road into town and generally causing a ruckus. Certainly such attacks have been a source of consternation for Afghans, but with their alarming regularity the US killing only five civilians in one go is for many just “another day in Afghanistan” and in many parts of the nation would’ve past barely acknowledged.
Rather the fury reflects not only the outrage at yet another civilian massacre, but also the serious resentment among residents of Kandahar, one of the most corrupt cities in the nation and one for which NATO is planning a massive invasion. It is exactly the same resentment which Karzai attempted to tap into in last weekend’s visit.
But it also spells disaster for the June invasion. The Pentagon has made tackling corruption and winning the “hearts and minds” in Kandahar the two centerpieces of the victory. They have already made it clear that ousting Wali Karzai, one of the driving forces behind the corruption, simply isn’t happening. Now it seems the “hearts and minds” portion isn’t going to happen either, as if the US can’t avoid killing civilians on the open highway they certainly won’t be able to avoid killing far more in a densely populated urban environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment