Obama puts brake on Afghan surge.

This is from the Timesonline.

There seems to be confusion and mixed signals about Afghanistan. While Obama reviews Afghan policy he is clearly committed to upping the ante and sending more troops. Another article says the troop deployment is on track.

As this article points out there does not seem to be any clear idea of what the endgame is supposed to be in Afghanistan. There may very well be negotiations with the Taliban and some face saving exit but the military seems to want a much longer campaign with more resources even to achieve just a better security position. NATO allies show little stomach for a long term commitment and most citizens disapprove of the mission altogether. It is surprising there is so little negative sentiment in the US towards Afghanistan. Perhaps after casualties increase the situation will change and also when realisation of the cost of the intervention finally sinks in during the recession.

Obama puts brake on Afghan surge
PRESIDENT Barack Obama has demanded that American defence chiefs review their strategy in Afghanistan before going ahead with a troop surge.
There is concern among senior Democrats that the military is preparing to send up to 30,000 extra troops without a coherent plan or exit strategy.
The Pentagon was set to announce the deployment of 17,000 extra soldiers and marines last week but Robert Gates, the defence secretary, postponed the decision after questions from Obama.
The president was concerned by a lack of strategy at his first meeting with Gates and the US joint chiefs of staff last month in “the tank”, the secure conference room in the Pentagon. He asked: “What’s the endgame?” and did not receive a convincing answer.
Larry Korb, a defence expert at the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank, said: “Obama is exactly right. Before he agrees to send 30,000 troops, he wants to know what the mission and the endgame is.”
Obama promised an extra 7,000-10,000 troops during the election campaign but the military has inflated its demands. Leading Democrats fear Afghanistan could become Obama’s “Vietnam quagmire”.
If the surge goes ahead the military intend to limit the mission to fighting the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and leave democracy building and reconstruction to Nato allies and civilians from the State Department and other agencies.
The United States has been pushing Britain to send several thousand more troops but there is just as much disagreement and confusion among British defence chiefs over the long-term aim. Gordon Brown is set to receive a full briefing this week.
General Sir Richard Dannatt, the army chief who will step down this summer, has insisted that troops need a rest and believes he can send only one battlegroup, senior defence sources said.
General Sir David Richards, his successor, believes that the two extra battlegroups the Americans have asked for is the minimum the UK should send, the sources said.