Rich-Poor gap widens in Europe, North America

People ask why there are billions available to bail out banks but no money to eradicate poverty. There are billions upon billions spent on the war on terror but millions for the war on poverty.
The answer is surely that people including the poor elect governments that put the interests of the rich before those of the poor and middle class. Since globalisation, the decline of the welfare state, the absence of any socialist alternative, the decline of working class power, the state has become even more in the interests of the best off. However, there is some truth to the trickle down theory. To avoid a complete collapse in demand you can expect another couple of hundred dollars or a tax break to stimulate the economy so that the rich can continue to become richer and there will be a few more crumbs to trickle down.
Both presidential candidates are spending millions to sell the illusion that they are going to change this situation. You have a choice of two who are actually variations on the same brand but masquerade as great competing warriors for the public interest. This theatre of the absurd is promoted at great length as great entertainment by the mainstream media. The system ensures that things will not essentially change.

Rich-Poor Gap Widens in Europe, North America
By Dan Hamilton
The Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released a study Tuesday showing clearly that the gap between rich and poor is widening in Europe and North America. The report, which covers developments spanning 20 years in 30 countries, contains some interesting nuggets:
• The U.S. has the greatest inequality in the OECD after Mexico and Turkey -- and the gap has grown rapidly since 2000. The richest 10 percent of Americans earn an average of $93,000 (highest in the OECD) - whereas the poorest 10 percent of Americans earn an average of $5,800 (about 20 percent lower than the OECD average).• Since 2000, income inequality has grown fastest in Germany, although Germany's gap remains below the OECD average.• British inequalities have been falling since 2000, but the rich-poor gap there is still wider than in three-fourths of OECD countries.• The rise in inequality is generally due to the rich improving their incomes relative both to low- and middle-income people. • Older people are much less likely to be poor than in the past. Poverty has shifted from pensioners to young adults and families with children.
The report is likely to fuel popular resentment on both sides of the Atlantic about what is widely perceived to be the essential unfairness of this month's rapid, massive bank bailouts engineered by governments in response to the financial crisis. This week Ulrike Mascher, President of Germany's largest social welfare advocacy organization, drove the point home: "People ask themselves why 500 billion euros can be mobilized very quickly to recapitalize banks while an effective poverty-fighting program is rejected due to budgetary concerns."
The study offers fodder to those like Mascher who argue that the bailouts must now be followed by economic stimulus efforts. In the U.S., Democrats are pushing for such a package, and both President Bush and Fed Chairman Bernanke have voiced support. In Europe opinions are mixed, but many are watching the U.S. debate. Anticipation of a U.S. growth package has already pushed the dollar to its highest level against the euro since the summer of 2007.
The OECD report also offers a caution, however, to those arguing that the best way to curb poverty and reduce inequalities is for government simply to redistribute wealth through social policies. Such approaches are proving to be less effective because technological progress and globalization are making it harder for low-skilled workers to find work. Studies by the IMF and many other sources confirm that better access to education and training is more likely to close income disparities.
So who bucked the trend? According to the report, the big winner was France - where income inequalities have fallen as fast as the country's integration into the global economy has risen. C'est incroyable.
Dan Hamilton, director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns Hopkins SAIS, is the host of Next Europe.


adolfo said…
Over the past generation, much mainstream economic thought has assumed that what is good for rich people is good for America. Naturally, this view has tended to transform university economics departments and business schools into cheerleaders for the Republican Party.

Popular posts from this blog

Danish company uses high tech solution to save water

Interview with UN Envoy Martin Kobler on situation in Libya

Dogs in small Finnish town to be fitted with special wolf-protection vests