The consolation prize is that the government is eligible to apply again next year. The government spin is to emphasize this aspect of the decision even though for now the government will get nothing. The fact that govt. flunked shows just how bad corruption must be within the government. This is from the Tribune (Manila)
Graft-ridden GMA gov’t flunks MCC test, no US grants for RP
By Michaela P. del Callar
12/11/2009
The Philippines under the Arroyo government has again failed to secure a large scale grant from a United States aid agency due to the long-standing problem of corruption in her government.
At a board meeting held in Washington Wednesday (Thursday in Manila) by the Millennium Challenge Corp. (MCC), however, the Philippines was re-selected to apply anew for additional funding for its development projects.
The results of its recent corruption test, which the Philippines flunked, had a great impact on the decision of MCC Board of Directors at its quarterly meeting when its directors selected and reviewed eligible developing countries for compact funding. Manila would have received additional $500-million poverty-reduction funding from the MCC only if it had passed the MCC’s anti-corruption index.
Control of corruption is considered by the MCC as the only pass/fail indicator. No country can receive funding under the Compact program unless it passes at least half of the 17 indicators and the Control of Corruption indicator.
This is the third time, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs, that the Philippines was endorsed as Compact eligible, allowing the country to qualify for a large scale-grant for fiscal year 2010 under the Millennium Challenge Corp.’s Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) program. The MCC Board of Directors is headed by US Department of State Secretary Hillary Clinton.
“The re-selection reaffirms both MCC’s confidence in the Philippines’ high capacity as development partner and the Philippine government’s highest level of political commitment to good governance,” Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto Romulo said, in trying to put a spin on the failure.
Romulo is optimistic that Manila would finally qualify next year following its re-selection to apply for compact funding by the MCC.
Showing posts with label corruption in Philippines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corruption in Philippines. Show all posts
Friday, December 11, 2009
Monday, January 19, 2009
Philippines: Turning a blind eye to corruption
This is from Malaya. (Manila)
No doubt the Arroyo govt. turns a blind eye to much corruption because some of it members and supporters profit from it. As the article points out the corruption itself was uncovered only the World Bank after everything was declared as OK by Philippine govt. officials. However, the Senate is likely to be happy to uncover dirt
Turning a blind eye to corruption
Editorial
‘The distinction drawn up the Palace is, as a matter of fact, more worrisome.’
MalacaƱang has said it is support-ing a proposed Senate investigation of anomalies in bidding for road projects which prompted the World Bank to blacklist seven companies, mostly foreign-owned, which allegedly colluded in submitting rigged bids.
What kind of a reaction is that? There was an attempt to steal from a government project (the money may have come from the World Bank but that is a loan that the people will eventually have to pay). Instead of conducting its own investigation and going after the officials on top of the project who allowed the rigging to happen, the Palace is now fobbing off the responsibility of going to the bottom of the anomaly to the Senate.
The blacklisting was the culmination of a two-year investigation by the World Bank vice president for integrity. The World Bank uncovered the initial evidence of rigging in November 2006. This was on two contracts worth $33 million between 2003 and 2006 where there was excessive pricing in three rounds of bidding. The irregularities stalled the release two years ago of the $232 million loan for the second package of the National Road Improvement and Management Program.
Does the Palace mean it did not lift a finger during the two years that the World Bank initial finding came to its attention? About P11 billion was involved in the World Bank freeze. The Palace apparently was hardly bothered by the resulting delay in the implementation of the road project.
The Palace also said the anomalies might have broken World Bank rules against corruption but it has yet to be established that Philippine laws were violated. Of course, violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act can only be established by an investigation. If nobody is looking, it stands to reason no violation of the law can be found.
The distinction drawn up the Palace is, as a matter of fact, more worrisome. Biddings for World Bank-assisted projects are conducted by local implementing agencies. The World Bank comes in only after the fact. In the case of the road program, the implementing agency had given its approval and the anomaly was found only during World Bank review.
How about projects that are solely funded by the government? How many biddings have been rigged and escaped detection for lack of a review process?
But we are belaboring the obvious. Kickbacks are considered SOP in government infrastructure projects. The Department of Public Works and Highways has long been notoriously corrupt. We have yet to hear of any big corruption case in the DPWH prosecuted under the Arroyo administration.
Yesterday the Palace said 3,200 infrastructure projects worth at least P60 billion will be undertaken during the first semester as part of pump-priming. Happy days are here again.
No doubt the Arroyo govt. turns a blind eye to much corruption because some of it members and supporters profit from it. As the article points out the corruption itself was uncovered only the World Bank after everything was declared as OK by Philippine govt. officials. However, the Senate is likely to be happy to uncover dirt
Turning a blind eye to corruption
Editorial
‘The distinction drawn up the Palace is, as a matter of fact, more worrisome.’
MalacaƱang has said it is support-ing a proposed Senate investigation of anomalies in bidding for road projects which prompted the World Bank to blacklist seven companies, mostly foreign-owned, which allegedly colluded in submitting rigged bids.
What kind of a reaction is that? There was an attempt to steal from a government project (the money may have come from the World Bank but that is a loan that the people will eventually have to pay). Instead of conducting its own investigation and going after the officials on top of the project who allowed the rigging to happen, the Palace is now fobbing off the responsibility of going to the bottom of the anomaly to the Senate.
The blacklisting was the culmination of a two-year investigation by the World Bank vice president for integrity. The World Bank uncovered the initial evidence of rigging in November 2006. This was on two contracts worth $33 million between 2003 and 2006 where there was excessive pricing in three rounds of bidding. The irregularities stalled the release two years ago of the $232 million loan for the second package of the National Road Improvement and Management Program.
Does the Palace mean it did not lift a finger during the two years that the World Bank initial finding came to its attention? About P11 billion was involved in the World Bank freeze. The Palace apparently was hardly bothered by the resulting delay in the implementation of the road project.
The Palace also said the anomalies might have broken World Bank rules against corruption but it has yet to be established that Philippine laws were violated. Of course, violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act can only be established by an investigation. If nobody is looking, it stands to reason no violation of the law can be found.
The distinction drawn up the Palace is, as a matter of fact, more worrisome. Biddings for World Bank-assisted projects are conducted by local implementing agencies. The World Bank comes in only after the fact. In the case of the road program, the implementing agency had given its approval and the anomaly was found only during World Bank review.
How about projects that are solely funded by the government? How many biddings have been rigged and escaped detection for lack of a review process?
But we are belaboring the obvious. Kickbacks are considered SOP in government infrastructure projects. The Department of Public Works and Highways has long been notoriously corrupt. We have yet to hear of any big corruption case in the DPWH prosecuted under the Arroyo administration.
Yesterday the Palace said 3,200 infrastructure projects worth at least P60 billion will be undertaken during the first semester as part of pump-priming. Happy days are here again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
US will bank Tik Tok unless it sells off its US operations
US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said during a CNBC interview that the Trump administration has decided that the Chinese internet app ...
-
US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said during a CNBC interview that the Trump administration has decided that the Chinese internet app ...
-
Mike Dunleavy the governor of the US state of Alaska is intending to introduce legislation that will repeal the two state boards which regu...
-
(August 11 ) In recent weeks, a recurring problem has been that Russia has intercepted US surveillance planes over the Black Sea as they wer...