This is from antiwar.com.
As this article points out not only is there a problem in Buner but there is an even worse situation in Balochistan one ignored in the media. Some in the Obama administration including no doubt Obama himself want to extend drone attacks to kill some militant leaders who are in Balochistan. However, the area is already rife with separatist strife and US drone attacks would make things much worse. For some reason this seems to be the general policy that Obama has taken throughout Pakistan and Afghanistan. He even accelerated military involvement while having a policy review of the Afghan war! Some review that! However, the US probably will not carry out drone attacks against refugee camps. However, they might look the other way if the Pakistani forces attacked them.
White House Split on Drone Strikes Against Balochistan
Posted By Jason Ditz
While today’s drone attack on South Waziristan Agency underscored the Obama Administration’s eagerness to continue hitting militants inside Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), the long-reported calls to attack Balochistan are being met with far more controversy.
Proponents say that much of the Taliban’s top leadership has taken up residence in and around the Baloch capital of Quetta. However the concern is that, while Pakistan has secretly backed the FATA strikes, they have managed to drive the ill-controlled mountainous hinterland into a constant state of opposition to the central government. The much larger Balochistan province, already struggling with a growing separatist movement, could hardly bare the repeatedly US bombardment the Waziristan agencies have, nor is Pakistan likely to stand aside while one of its major cities is attacked. The provincial governor is already warning that the situation could rapidly wind up out of control.
What’s more the Taliban are believed to be staying in the Afghan refugee camps around Quetta, and while it’s hardly without precedent, American planes attacking a camp teeming with innocent civilian refugees of an American war would be, to quote one former State Department official, “a real human rights controversy.”
Copyright © 2009 News From Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.