This area seems to be a powder keg. Conflict is increasing and there does not seem to be any accomodation of the Kurds with ethnic minorities but instead an attempt to drive out Arabs many of whom settled in Kirkuk during Saddam's reign.
Northern Iraq seen as next front in war
By By Louise Roug, Times Staff Writer
Kirkuk, Iraq — American officials, regional leaders and residents are increasingly worried that this northern oil-rich city could develop into a third front in the country’s civil war just as additional US troops arrive in Baghdad and Al Anbar province as reinforcements for battles there.
Al Qaeda-linked fighters recently have surfaced here, launching a wave of lethal attacks, US and Iraqi officials say. The attacks come amid a rise in communal tensions in the months before a referendum on the status of the city and the surrounding province.
Elsewhere in Iraq, Shiite and Sunni Arab Muslims are locked in a bitter civil war. Here, the two groups have a common cause against the Kurds, a non-Arab minority that dominates Iraq’s far-northern provinces.
The Kurds, Arabs and Turkmens, another minority group, each want control of this city and the region. At stake are land, water and some of Iraq’s richest oil reserves.
None of the groups want war, they say. Yet everyone here appears to be preparing for it.
“They are right when they call it a time bomb,” said Sheik Abdul Rahman Obeidi, a prominent Sunni Arab leader in Kirkuk. “We will not leave, and we will not let anyone take Kirkuk. We are ready to fight. We hope we won’t have to, but we’re ready.”
Kurdish leaders, in turn, warn that they will take the city by law or by force.
“People don’t have any more patience,” said Kurdish Councilman Rebwar Faiq Talabani, sitting in Kirkuk’s heavily fortified provincial council building. “They are telling the government, ‘If you can’t get our rights back, we’ll do it by ourselves’.“
Neighbouring countries, especially Turkey and Iran, fear that if the Kurds do gain control of Kirkuk, Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdish region would have the confidence and economic power to move toward independence. That could embolden Kurdish militants in the surrounding countries and further destabilise the region. Turkish officials recently have threatened to intervene if the Kurds take over Kirkuk and have warned against efforts to change the city’s population balance.
“Turkey cannot stand idly by, watching the efforts to change the demographic structure of Kirkuk,” Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said last month, according to the Cihan News Agency.
Turkish officials recently hosted a conference in Ankara, the Turkish capital, on the future of Kirkuk. Participants included Sunni Arab and Turkmen parties as well as the political party affiliated with radical Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr, all of whom oppose Kirkuk’s inclusion in Kurdistan. None of the main Kurdish parties were invited, and Kurdish lawmakers responded angrily, denouncing what they described as Turkish interference.
Against this backdrop of ethnic, political and regional tensions, Iraq’s new constitution mandates that a referendum on control of Kirkuk be held by the end of this year. If the vote goes ahead as scheduled, most analysts expect the Kurds to win.
Kurdish bureaucrats are pushing through little-noticed administrative decisions that will take away the voting rights of tens of thousands of Arabs.
Last year, at least 325 people were killed and 1,390 wounded in this city of about 1 million. During the first three weeks of this year, bombings and assassinations left 23 dead and 102 injured, police say. And on Sunday, police say, two car bombs killed 11 people and wounded 34.
“We expect increased violence when we get closer to” the referendum, said Maj. Gen. Anwar Mohammed Amin, the top Iraqi commander in Kirkuk.
The emergence of fighters from two radical Islamic groups with ties to Al Qaeda after years of lying low is especially troublesome, officials say. The groups, known as Ansar al Sunna and the Islamic Army in Iraq, have launched a bombing campaign targeting politicians and civilians. Their aim is to foment violence between ethnic and sectarian groups much as they have done in Baghdad and elsewhere, officials say.
Painting Iraq’s Sunni Arab guerrillas as Al Qaeda associates serves Kurds in their goal of taking control of Kirkuk and its environs by making the aims of their rivals seem less legitimate.
Assassinations, bombings and attacks on Kurdish parties’ headquarters by Shiite militias and Sunni groups linked to Al Qaeda “are now all part of Kirkuk’s violent landscape,” said a report last month from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Turkmen and Arab politicians also have been targeted in apparent retaliation by Kurds.
“Kirkuk is as likely as Baghdad to produce a calamity that can fracture Iraq,” the report’s authors wrote, recommending a delay of the referendum. The International Crisis Group, a nonprofit think tank based in Belgium, and the US government’s bipartisan Iraq Study Group also have recommended postponement.
But for Kurds, this year presents a historic opportunity they won’t part with willingly.
If Kirkuk were annexed to their region, Kurds would no longer be economically beholden to the rest of Iraq. Without Kirkuk, however, Kurdistan is not an economically viable state.
Once a distant dream carried in the heart of Kurdish peshmerga fighters as they battled Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein’s army in the mountains, full independence is now tantalizingly within reach.
If the timetable leading to the referendum is not followed, Kirkuk will be thrust into chaos, said Talabani, the provincial councilman. “It will be a civil war,” he said. “Worse than Baghdad, because it will be a battle of ethnicities.”
For nationalist Arabs and minority Turkmens, meanwhile, Kurdish appropriation of Kirkuk would signify the first step toward Iraq’s disintegration. Turkmens do not want to become part of an independent Kurdistan, but they don’t want to be controlled by Baghdad either. Most Arabs want to remain part of a unified Iraq.
As the various constituencies manoeuvre before the referendum, the issue of just who has the right to vote is emerging as a major point of contention.
In 1957, the year of Kirkuk’s last reliable census, Turkmens made up 40 per cent of the population, whereas Kurds composed 35 per cent, Arabs 24 per cent and Christians 1 per cent. In the surrounding province, Kurds were a majority, constituting 55 per cent of the inhabitants.
During the 1970s, however, Hussein forcibly removed 250,000 Kurds from Kirkuk, giving their property to Arabs in an effort to “Arabise” the city and its oil. Many of the new residents were Shiites moved here from villages in the south.
Since the US-led invasion in 2003, the demographics have shifted again. Thousands of Arabs and Turkmens have left because of political pressure and violence. And as many as 350,000 Kurds have come to Kirkuk, Iraqi and American officials say. In dilapidated camps throughout the city, thousands of Kurds now wait for property claims to be resolved; Kurdish officials complain that the government in Baghdad is slowing the process.
The Kurds want Arabs who moved here under Hussein to return to the south, and the recent administrative moves are aimed at removing them as potential voters in the referendum.
Kurdish officials have recently proposed a cash incentive for Arabs, compensation of about US$19,000 for each family willing to give up property and voting rights in the city. The tens of thousands of Arabs affected would be allowed to stay — though required to live in other accommodations — but would not be able to vote on Kirkuk’s future, the officials say.
“I don’t believe they have the right to vote in the referendum,” said Adnan Mufti, the powerful speaker of Kurdistan’s regional parliament. Even Arabs born in Kirkuk to parents who came from the south will be ineligible, he said. “It’s the mistake of their fathers.”
Arabs and Turkmens accuse Kurdish politicians of gerrymandering and administrative jujitsu. “Many of the Kurds who returned to Kirkuk are not the original residents of the city,” said Abass Ahmed, a 60-year-old Turkmen. “They are actually Kurds from other Kurdish regions.”
Because of the demographic shifts and the Sunni Arab boycott of the 2005 election, Arabs already have little representation in the city. Kurds control 26 of the 41 provincial council seats as well as the army, police and intelligence services in the city.
Iraqi security forces here mostly strike against Arab neighborhoods, said Amin, the Iraqi commander. But this is because Ansar al Sunna and the Islamic Army in Iraq are primarily Arab groups, he added.
But residents and international observers accuse the Kurds of abusing Arabs and Turkmens and holding them in secret and largely unsupervised prison facilities.
“We are being insulted especially in the Arab villages and the Arab neighborhoods,” said Obeidi, the Sunni Arab sheik. “I think, for the Kurdish forces, it’s like revenge.”
These alleged human rights violations inflame the situation, analysts warn and local politicians confirm.
“We are all arming ourselves,” a politician from Kirkuk recently told the International Crisis Group. “We are afraid. There is talk of civil war. Anything could start it.”